It is usual, when discussing Milankovitch cycles, to dismiss any effect of obliquity on global, annual mean insolation based on the fact that the Earth is a sphere. I did it myself in a comment on Skeptical Science. As the Earth is an oblate spheroid, however, it is not strictly accurate. In particular, on the equinoxes, the Earth presents its minimum aspect to the Sun, showing an eclipsed area of 1.2737 x 1014 m2 to the Sun. As the Earth moves to the solstice (either winter or summer) it presents its maximum aspect, showing an eclipsed area of 1.2744 x 1014 m2. That represents a difference of 0.05% in recieved sunlight, or approximately 0.12 W/m2. That seasonal variation is much less than the 6.8% (16.2 W/m2) seasonal variation due to the eccentricity of the Earth's orbit.
Search This Blog
Saturday, October 3, 2015
Saturday, September 19, 2015
Friday, May 29, 2015
Energy contributions to the Earth's surface temperature
Here are nearly all energy sources that contribute to the Earth's Global Means Surface Temperature (GMST):
Monday, May 25, 2015
Grantham and the media
I haven't written a post on the Queensland 2011 floods for a while. It is, however, back in the news due to issues relating to events at Grantham. I have very little to say about that in particular. Those issues turn on detailed matters of topography and hydrology on which neither I, nor the residents of Grantham have the necessary knowledge to have an informed opinion. The residents of Grantham do, of course, have the relevant expertise on what they saw; and what they saw must inform any hydrological assessment of the effects of the flood on Grantham. Knowing what you saw, and interpreting its significance, however, are not the same thing. Therefore the claims of the Grantham residents do not determine what happened in 2011, and should not by themselves determine the results of the current inquiry.
The task of the inquiry is being made harder by bad reporting on the floods. I discuss below the fold one such example of bad reporting by Channel Nine, echoed by the Sydney Morning Herald. Once again I have copied a comment from SkS for convenience, and in this case the first part of the comment is not directly relevant to the issue of bad reporting by media. I have retained it, however, as it does give useful background on the general situation in the Lockyer Valley at the time of the Grantham flood of Jan 10, 2011.
The task of the inquiry is being made harder by bad reporting on the floods. I discuss below the fold one such example of bad reporting by Channel Nine, echoed by the Sydney Morning Herald. Once again I have copied a comment from SkS for convenience, and in this case the first part of the comment is not directly relevant to the issue of bad reporting by media. I have retained it, however, as it does give useful background on the general situation in the Lockyer Valley at the time of the Grantham flood of Jan 10, 2011.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)